…in evitable news [DOT 6/8/24]

inevitable views...

…mornin’ all…sorry about sunday but it turned out to be an unavoidable non-starter at short notice so there wasn’t much to be done about it…which it could be argued makes it the exact opposite of the “unrest” that’s been troubling the UK of late…now…that hasn’t gone the way of bangladesh

Why has Bangladesh’s prime minister Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled? [Guardian]

…but…if you try…you can sort of see how a fairly specific brand of dipshit would get it in their head that if they took the chip on their shoulder routine online they could get a few hundred fellow dipshits to fuck a few places up & set some shit alight & loot some shops & brick a cop or two…the papers would run with it & the pictures would look like a big deal…& it wouldn’t just be a mother at home with her kids who got terrified by the assholes tearing down her garden fence to use that & the firewood to attack other stuff…like the police…these are small-minded people…so…in their head there’s a straight line from that kind of thing not only *from* the deaths of small children by violence…which is allegedly their justification…but straight through some…either deliberately or in a self-spawning miracle of AI-enhanced algorithmic gifting to the people what they want…inaccurate claims about who did that…*to* trying to commit arson on a hotel housing migrants & asylum seekers…very much small children included…who would have burned to death if the numbskulled nimby brigades of incoherent intolerance had been successful in their efforts to post hoc ergo propter hoc retcon their way from reprehensible to revered

…when you think about it…in a bunch of ways a lamentable amount of it is nothing new…some of it is…but the political opportunism of it…not hardly…so…bit of context…rough & ready 14 years of the tories burning through PMs like they were banknotes on a night out with the bullingdon boys…a lot of shit is pretty fucked on the public services front & the bank account is looking gaunt AF…the replacements said they wouldn’t hike certain taxes but are commited to spending that implies they will have to at some point…the last lot having just recently used some semantics to “not raise taxes” while raising the tax take at the same time…which is a very tory way of doing that sort of thing…inflation & a rising cost of living has upped a few paychecks…but we thought we’d freeze the boundaries for the tax brackets at levels that were accurate-ish pre-pandemic so as luck would have it the number of people probably struggling with the increases in their cost of living who now get to be in a higher tax bracket & we’ve suddenly made less well-off than before they got that raise can comfort themselves with how we haven’t raised taxes like the labour party would…if you need us we’ll be over here patting ourselves on the back for how great we are are at this

…&…one of the things that they looked at in a similar light was “the prison estate”…so…early doors there was a fair bit of notice taken of how an ex-DPP…which is sort of but not exactly like being the AG…prime minister would handle inheriting prisons that were bursting at the overpopulated seams…& he appoinnted a KC & a guy who employs possibly more felons than any other business to get on that…& pretty swiftly announced that they were going to fast-track the release of some categories of prisoners…cue predictable coverage warning about flooding the population with precisely the sorts who wouldn’t qualify for early release…all pretty predictable but weatherable…not least while parliament isn’t in session…which is when this latest attack of the god-awfuls came calling…but…again with context…back when he was the DPP & some similar bouts of knuckle-headed narratives trying to spin heraldry out of hooliganism kicked off…he prosecuted a slew of them quick-smart & didn’t go light on the sentencing…so…haven’t seen it typed up this way…after the phrase “standing army” cropped up it didn’t get a look-in in the stampede…but per the radio…in the shape of a high-ranking member of the met…”4,000″ officers is a number pulled out of the air & signifying basically nothing…it’s business as usual…in which there are more than 4,000 officers with public order training nationwide & regional forces being supplemented with assistance from out of town happens literally everywhere from tiny hamlets to bleeding london on the regular…so it’s more a scheduling issue to make sure to spread it around & not hammer some poor bunch of bobbies with permanent riot-duty because they upset the person who sets the rota…& in a similar (if slightly sped up) vein

“We will make sure that anyone that is given a custodial sentence as a result of the riots and disorder, there will be a prison place waiting for them,” the justice minister Heidi Alexander told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

In response to the disorder, the government had introduced 567 additional prison places that were due to come forward at the end of the month, Alexander said.
[…]
“We are confident that prison spaces will be there so that people who are perpetrating this disgusting behaviour on our streets and in our communities it they’re given a custodial sentence they will be serving in jail,” Alexander said.

As disorder continued for a seventh day on Monday, Jemima Laing, a Labour councillor in Plymouth, described “a pretty grim” night in the port city in Devon after police officers were injured during “sustained violence”. Several officers sustained minor injuries and two members of the public were taken to hospital.

Laing said it was upsetting to see the city as a “stop on this racist tour that seems to be happening”. About 150 officers who were deployed to the city centre tried to keep rival demonstrations apart as masked anti-immigration protesters launched missiles at a counter-demonstration where people held signs that read: “No place for hate” and “Say no to Nazis.”

“I’m just so angry that so many people from outside our city felt it was OK to come here and cause such disruption and unrest,” Laing told the Today programme.

“Last night’s events were not reflective of us as a city,” said Laing, laying blame on those from beyond the city who came to “cause trouble”. “It’s really not what Plymouth’s about.”

Devon and Cornwall police said six arrests were made in Plymouth after bricks and fireworks were launched at officers.

…the fireworks are new…in the sense of getting mentioned, that is…only been inert “missiles” talked about before…but I can remember kids in manchester playing chicken with fireworks just for shits & giggles more decades ago than I care to mention…so…not “new” new…but arguably indicative of that tour including some escalation in terms of the show it’s putting on…even then, though, what’s escalation in plymouth is still on the light end of the disorder spectrum in belfast

In Belfast, social media footage showed officers attacked with missiles in the Donegall Road and Sandy Row areas. The violence occurred in the same area where two businesses were attacked on Saturday.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/06/police-officers-injured-in-plymouth-and-disorder-in-belfast-as-violence-spreads

…so…while there’s nothing particularly surprising or unpredictable about how starmer will respond to this sort of thing

In a statements on Friday and Sunday, Starmer has made it clear he wants the response to thuggery to be swift and decisive. He has called in the police to coordinate tactics, as well as delivering a message to Muslims and others frightened by the violence that this does not represent Britain. And he has named the forces he holds responsible – the far right exploiting a horrific tragedy to whip up disinformation and target migrants.

…even goes for most of his official opposition

There has also been little criticism of Starmer’s approach from the Conservatives, with former shadow home secretary David Davis saying: “Remember, the riots started with a lie, or three lies … I don’t have that many criticisms of the government or the police on this, to be honest.

“All what I would say is, perhaps they should have been faster to crush all that misinformation.”

…but…outside the likes of dianne abbott helpfully suggesting earnestly that recalling parliament would be the only way to duly reassure their constituents that the politicians had it all in hand by taking up the time of the people who we need to do things in talking about things…which she might very well earnestly believe…you know who really wants to get in the commons & bray about how they represent the voice of the common man…the man with everything in common with the EDL gobshite lounging about in cyprus being described as “on holiday” because even skipping the country after skipping a court appearance for a thing he returned to the jurisdiction expressly to re-offend on the relevant count somehow failed to grant the power of arrest & detaining more than temporarily to the constabulary…which is a right fucking headscratcher if you ask me…but…more of that anon, as the saying goes

However, a bigger difficulty for Starmer lies in the politics of the situation after the initial practical response, and how he reacts to Nigel Farage’s Reform party. Its politicians claimed over this weekend that the far right were not to blame for the riots, but discontent and unease about immigration.

Labour sources say the view is that it is counterproductive to give Farage and his crew the oxygen of too much direct criticism, when the focus should be on the policing and tackling the rioters.

However, others within the party are worried that Labour failing to challenge Farage more comprehensively head-on allows his anti-migrant insinuations to become part of mainstream political rhetoric, especially when he now has five MPs and received 4m votes at the election.

Hostile language about migrants has become increasingly mainstream in the last five years, fuelled by those such as Suella Braverman, the former home secretary, referring to migrants as an invasion, and Lee Anderson, the former Tory deputy chair turned Reform MP, talking of wanting asylum seekers to “fuck off back to France” and claiming baselessly that the Labour mayor of London was controlled by Islamists.

Starmer has taken the view that he needed to explicitly condemn the far right for being behind the violence – making it clear that whatever the underlying motive, causing fear, damage and disorder are never acceptable. But there may come a time soon when he needs to more strongly confront the anti-migrant rhetoric that lies behind the violence as well, whether it comes from protesters or politicians.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/04/keir-starmer-decisive-on-mob-violence-but-faces-dilemma-over-reform

…&…maybe it’s true, even…I’d probably argue that the sort of debate that likely imagines replacing the current one would still be wide of where I’d line it up…but I have some funny ideas about the fundamental dishonesty of not including the overlapping bits of the venn diagram marked as “industry” & “climate-related” in ways that could conceivably make vast national & international infrastructure projects the proverbial “all hands on deck” kind of deal in a fashion that would hoover up more immigrants than even climate change with a funnel-feed of politically directed bit of human trafficking could throw at places…but that has more in common with speculative fiction than reality…so the guardian might be more useful for purposes of triangulation…anyway…in dog-whistle/fig-leaf combo terms…immigration => the more right you are the more you hate it & vice versa so if you think it’s a good thing you’re a communist traitor to your class & country & dangerously radical in your liberalism whereas if you want to burn foreign children in their beds while you bung bricks at policemen & throw the odd nazi salute then you’d be making your forefathers who fought in the great war prouder than the lot that got magna carta done

…how’s that for a balanced debate?

The Commons standards watchdog should hold Nigel Farage to account over his “dangerous comments” following the week’s violent disorder in the wake of the Southport murders, a Liverpool MP has said.

Kim Johnson, Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, said Farage’s comments “cannot be left to fester” and should be examined by the parliamentary standards commissioner.

Farage has released two videos since three children were murdered in Southport last week. In the first, he questioned whether police were withholding information about who was responsible for the murders.

It came at a time when false information was circulating on social media that a Muslim asylum seeker was responsible, which fuelled disorder at a mosque in Southport.

In a second video, Farage challenged Keir Starmer’s argument that the violent protests were the fault of the far right, saying it was “a reaction to fear, to discomfort, to unease that is out there shared by tens of millions of people”.

Lee Anderson, the Reform MP and former Tory deputy chair, made a similar argument, writing on X: “This problem has been caused by smug politicians who have refused to listen to the concerns of British people. It has festered and now it has boiled over. Parliament must listen, parliament must act but it must not blame the British people.” He also referred to the prime minister as “Keir Stalin” in a reference to the Russian dictator.

Senior politicians have held back from being too critical of Farage, although the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, said on Wednesday that there was “a level of responsibility … and it’s not to stoke up what conspiracy theories or what you think might have happened”.

However, several members of the public claim on social media to have submitted complaints about the Reform leader to the parliamentary standards commissioner, who can investigate any behaviour that brings parliament into disrepute.

[Kim] Johnson [Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside] said: “Nigel Farage’s dangerous comments cannot be left to fester. He is the voice of the EDL [English Defence League] in parliament, using his platform to spread fear and misinformation. Tensions are high and our politicians should be doing everything in our power to advocate for peace and unity, and support our communities standing resolutely against the racism and hatred displayed over the last few days. With so much at stake, we need urgent action from the Commons standards committee and the police to hold him to account.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/04/watchdog-should-investigate-farages-dangerous-comments-says-liverpool-mp

…so far…clear enough, I’d imagine

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/04/the-observer-view-on-the-riots-after-the-southport-killings-extremists-have-launched-an-assault-on-the-rule-of-law

…you get it…imagine the guys who hung out with the guy with the hammer who went full-cliché with the hammer & the broken windows during one of the post-george-floyd protests in hope of escalating the thing to rittenhouse proportions…it’s the chickenshit chickenhawk thing that’s the common thread connecting your farage-grade garbage person with your middle-name-yaxley yaking away from his perch poolside like a proper racist tourist…which totally isn’t like being an immigrant in the country whose hospitality he’s enjoying rather than his majesty’s…he hasn’t fled the country he’s so nationalisticly uber-proud of being from in contempt of court…he’s bravely gone on holiday while trying to remote in to “work” with an alibi in a different time zone

Inside Tommy Robinson’s £400-a-night Cyprus getaway during far-right riots across UK [Independent]

…because that’s how the game works now, right?

…well…sort of…there’s some mixed signals

After chairing an emergency Cobra meeting on Monday morning, the Prime Minister stressed that “the criminal law applies online as well as offline”.
[…]
The police, Home Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the National Crime Agency are working to tackle criminality online and to ensure people are prosecuted for online criminal activity, according to a read-out of the Westminster gathering.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman told reporters: “Anyone who stokes this violence, whether on the internet or in person, can be prosecuted and face prison.”

Those stoking violence online could face jail, Keir Starmer says [Independent]

Neil Basu, Britain’s former head of counter-terrorism, said he believed the attack should be treated as an act of terrorism as he condemned the rioters as “bullies and cowards”.

“Trying to set ablaze a building with people inside, whom you have made clear you detest, is an act of violence against people and property with a racial cause designed to intimidate a section of the public – be it Muslims or asylum seekers,” he said.

“Not only does it fit the definition of terrorism, it is terrorism. It’s nothing short of an attempt at a modern-day lynching and the people who did it should be facing life imprisonment, not a five-year sentence for violent disorder.”

…no argument from me against that

There are fears that unrest could continue to spread after a list of solicitors’ firms and advice agencies were shared as targets for gatherings in the coming days.

A message believed to have been widely shared on chat groups lists addresses for immigration law specialists and advice organisations across England and invites people to “mask up” if they go.

Tell Mama, a group monitoring Islamophobia in the UK, said it had alerted counter-terrorism police to the “far-right threats on Telegram that seek to target immigration solicitors and refugee services” in more than 30 locations across the country on Wednesday. The Labour MP Stella Creasy said she was looking into a potential target in her east London constituency.
[…]
The Law Society of England and Wales president, Nick Emmerson, condemned the violence that has already taken place, and said the organisation has “serious concerns about the safety and wellbeing of our members” after the list was shared giving “targets for further protest and violence this week”.

Basu, who was the head of counter-terrorism from 2018 to 2021, said the organisers of the protests should also face punishment.

“We overestimate the intelligence of thugs. They don’t think about the consequences of their actions until it’s too late, but jail a few and the others will run back under cover. They are bullies and cowards,” he said.

“Their criminal puppet masters, the organisers, those who encourage, have to be dealt with too. They are also bullies and cowards.”

Police believe that violence has been the primary aim of those organising the series of far-right led gatherings in the last week.

The chief constable of Essex police, BJ Harrington, who is the national lead for public order, said: “They are saying they are English patriots and protesting against immigration, but they are intent on thuggery and violence and they do not care about the communities they claim to care about.”
[…]
He said the groups “masquerade as protesters”, before adding: “What they say and do is quite to the contrary. They are attacking police and the fabric of communities. It’s not protest, it is thuggery.”

Harrington was a public order commander in the Metropolitan police when the 2011 riots erupted in London before spreading across England.

Asked if the violence this week was as serious as in 2011, Harrington said: “The implications of it, yes; we have communities across the country in fear and have seen property damage. The scale is not the same. Our response is faster and swifter.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/05/far-right-violence-should-be-treated-as-terrorism-says-former-police-chief

…so…if what yaxley yacks up from sunny cyprus is indiscernible from what nige belches forth from wherever he’s currently blighting…& those things fit the bill for being described as terrorism in the opinion of at least one person qualifed to have served as the head of dealing with terrorism for a whole united kingdom that lot appear to mostly want to divide…&…presumably after the mystery ??? “stage two”…”conquer”…or at least profit from…so…with the illegal-offline is illegal-online standard of equivalence & all…one seems forced to ask the question that has once more been rather explictly begged

…I mean

Protests reveal deep-rooted anger, but UK is not at boiling point [BBC]

…if the MAGA cap fits

UK examines foreign states’ role in sowing discord leading to riots [Reuters]

…elon’s a terrorist, right?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/05/no-10-criticises-elon-musk-post-x-riots

…asking for a friend

…only just remembered but meant to say there seems to be dead air for that back half or so of the runtime on #14 (why do) but the only other links weren’t from the label or whatever so I figured I’d award the click-points to them as made the ting?
avataravataravataravataravataravataravataravatar

34 Comments

  1. There aren’t nearly enough photos of Tommy Robinson’s £400 Cypriot getaway, but did you see the assemble-it-yourself full-English-breakfast buffet? Gross. I’ve had better breakfasts at Hampton Inns and I didn’t pay £400 a night.

    This is obviously a tourist trap meant to reel in that certain kind of Brit, like Tommy Robinson, who feels deeply uneasy around non-Brits. I can picture it now. The lounge chairs occupied by pillowy, sunburnt retirees. The cans of Heineken, a favorite of Brits abroad, I don’t know why. The small bar doling out gin by the gallon. The soccer-related exchange of insights that almost comes to blows. The critiques, all negative, of the resort staff and the creatures to be found once beyond the gates.

    Still, I would go.

  2. News from the City of Yes:

    “There is so much train traffic here because the trains are crossing, going south and going east and there’s so many delays,” Democratic state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who represents the area and has been pushing for system upgrades, said.

    It’s on the MTA’s to-do list, especially when it comes to train signals.

    “The MTA has been studying this problem for close to four decades. The first study was in 1967,” he said.

    Apparently arithmetic is not Zellnor Myrie’s strong suit. To make this even more infuriating, 1967 was 57 years ago.

  3. Heh.

    As Trump fumes, Republicans wince at ‘public nervous breakdown’

    “This is what you would call a public nervous breakdown,” said Matthew Bartlett, a GOP strategist and former Trump administration appointee. “This is a guy who cut through the Republican primary like a knife through butter. This is a guy who pummeled a semi-conscious president in a debate and literally out of a race. And now this is a guy who cannot come to grips with a competitive presidential race that would require discipline and effective messaging. And we’re seeing a candidate and a campaign absolutely melt down.”

    -snip-

    “I think we are long past the time where we thought he could maybe rein in his worst angels and he’s going to keep doing this and no amount of polling data or advice from people close to him will change him,” said Barrett Marson, an Arizona-based Republican strategist. “He’s a 78-year-old guy stuck in his ways. And this has been his way for decades.”

    • One of the reasons I still thought Biden could/would win is that the media was never going to call attention to it, but Trump has been pretty clearly strrrrrruggling for a while. He seems completely spent now; I can only imagine how much shit they’re going to have to pump him full of to get him upright in October.

      • Yeah. The Harris campaign tweeted out a campaign schedule with (I think) 9 dates on it in the next two weeks. Next to it they put Trump’s with 1 date. Rather an elegant insult, I’d say.

        Besides his declining mental capacity, Trump physically can’t keep up the pace. And it’s not just age, it’s general health. He’s obese. I’m sure there are a ton of other conditions he keeps hidden. He’s too tired to barnstorm, and it shows. And Vance is too despised to serve as a proxy, even among MAGAs.

        • Totally, and the only real reason it’s not a bigger story is because the media went all in on Biden and Trump’s voice sounds about the same as it did (and the bar for his baseline mental capacity was already so impossibly low that he’d need to like do baby babble for a week before the Times wrote a “Trump’s New Strategy Of MAGA Babble Has True Believers Saying ‘Daa Daa’ “)

          I also think in retrospect that maybe we all overlooked how the 2020 campaign was lower-impact because of Covid and neither one of these guys would have done as well if it had been a more “normal” election cycle.

  4. Let’s not get carried away, Aunt Nan:

    https://nbcmontana.com/news/nation-world/pelosi-wants-biden-added-to-mount-rushmore-such-a-consequential-president-nancy-joe-kamala-harris-november-election-2024-presidential-washington-dc-politics-abraham-lincoln-teddy-roosevelt-george-washington-and-thomas-jefferson

    We know, you had nothing to do with shoving Biden out the door and you love him so much, but this comes off as bizarre and, at 84, you might be the next one to be defenestrated.

    • The funny thing about this … well, OK, there are like 10 funny things about this, but maybe the funniest is that Biden’s biggest achievement is most likely going to be denting (if not outright breaking) the post-Reagan consensus of the Democratic Party that, actually, the only viable option is to be slightly less Republican than the Republicans, a consensus held up for decades by Nancy Pelosi herself! He did a great job undoing her entire career!

      • Pelosi has never been about policy, just process. In the standard setup for the House she should have been in the Steny Hoyer Majority Leader role of organizing and vote counting, while the Speaker was more of the policy leader and voice of the party.

        She’s very possibly the best congressional leader ever in building consensus and coalitions, and doing the kind of horse trading (in a good way) that turns disarray into array. But she really needed someone else to set the agenda.

        • I would say she’s the modern GOAT of whipping a caucus/party together, but yeah, she rarely used that skill in ways that ever pushed policy forward. She (like many others) kept those Reagan scars for way too long and ultimately most of her wins were rearguard action from keeping the GOP of going too far. (Which is good! But at some point you have to offer an alternative and it frankly took until fuckin’ Joe Biden of all people to start the ball rolling in the other direction.)

          • Another piece of it is that she and liberals like AOC made peace in 2020 and cut a deal where they would get a big push on green infrastructure and other big ticket items like corporate taxes. Pelosi got an agreement that they would stick to the overall message and support party unity.

            Pelosi was savvy enough to understand that the progressive wing was operating in good faith in a way that the old Blue Dog coalition never did. The progressives turned out to be willing to cut a deal and stick to it while the old center right Democrats always seemed to dither and make new demands at the last minute.

            It became funny to watch the DC press keep trying to go to the progressives and try to get them to act like it was 1994, only to have the refuse to rise to the bait. Pelosi understood what congressional reporters stuck on the “Dems in Disarray!” cliche didn’t – things had changed in her party.

  5. Conservatives love to rile people up and then when it inevitably turns violent and a large majority of people are completely turned off, pivot toward “But lots of people are mad!” and it’s like sure they are, because you have spoon-fed them rage for decades now and gee, it turns out your lot are way more likely to be violent criminals than the people you’re trying to pogrom. Funny how that works.

    The biggest problem, though, is that even if most people agree this is bad, they’re way too timid to do what’s necessary to actually put their foot down about it. Farage, Trump, same thing — “gee this is terrible and bad for our country” but ultimately they not only don’t do anything to put up barriers to them, they bend their policy in that direction anyway! 

  6. Bloomberg News fired top White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs and demoted an editor after Bloomberg jumped the gun publishing that Evan Gershkovich and other prisoners were freed.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/05/media/bloomberg-news-discipline-evan-gershkovich-embargo/index.html

    They ran the story while the Russian plane was still in transit, and a news embargo was in place until the release was complete – the US had concerns that the Russians may still play games along the way.

    Jacobs issued a statement saying ““In reporting the story about Evan’s release, I worked hand in hand with my editors to adhere to editorial standards and guidelines…. At no time did I do anything that was knowingly inconsistent with the administration’s embargo or that would put anyone involved at risk.”

    The first part is undoubtably true. There is no way a reporter gets to publish a major story without editors engaged in the process, including authorizing the content going live online. There probably ought to be even more consequences for her editors than what Bloomberg has done.

    The second is BS. There is no way in these situations that reporters are not told directly about the reasons for the embargo. There are definitely dumb news embargos – you’ll get them from a drug store chain hoping to keep the launch of a new store brand toothpaste quiet until a certain date. But something this complicated and fragile is going to involve detailed explanations of the reasons involved.

    Jacobs is a hack. She was in the middle of a right wing frenzy about Harris and the pronounciation of the word “the” and has a history of being overly cozy with Trump sources. But reporters like her operate with the knowledge and encouragement of their editors, and it sounds like Bloomberg is treating this as a bad apple problem and not asking how that bad apple got there in the first place.

    • It’s kind of baffling that she got fired but the editor merely got demoted. Every news org I know of, I can say without question that editors are 99.9999% of the time the ones pushing the “publish” button on a story and the embargo being kept would be even more on the editor than the reporter.

      So it seems like a real head-scratcher that she’d take the worse punishment unless she went wayyyyy outside the usual chain of command on this story. And if that’s the case, ain’t nobody gonna be lining up to hire her (outside of the right-wing fever swamps, of course.)

  7. Google losing its antitrust case is a big deal, although I’m sure it will drag on for years.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/business/google-loses-antitrust-lawsuit-doj/index.html

    I’m sure this will feed tech bro paranoia that the Dems are out to get them, although this was started at the end of the Trump term.

    The stupid thing about the tech bros is that Trump and the GOP have have been happy to lob bombshells and then break deals. The Dems are not friendly but they’re consistent, and in the long run consistent tax and antitrust policies are better for the industry than weirdo hot and cold policies.

    And of course Trump is fully capable of doing to tech oligarchs what Putin does to his oligarchs.

    • …the asymmetry between those who understand the tech itself & those who have to try to achieve aims via legislation…or legislatures, anyroad…is likely with us for a long-enough haul for it to make some sense to try to price the former into the approach to the latter

      …but the people who don’t get how shit like trump on twitter…or yaxley on telegram…or farage in the commons…or elon “freaking weirder than the weird lot” musk on the thing that amusingly he gets referred to as being “[e]x owner” about…or joe rogan on netflix…has a common denominator running through its bottom line no matter how low they drive the bar for “lowest”…those aren’t the younger or the smarter people most places I can think of…& they’re a finite supply…the limits of which are generally a lot closer to being tapped out producing even one good sized mob of the [tiki-]torches & pitchfork [t-shirts][not having a dig at pitchfork fans, btw] variety…imagine one way some of tommy’s boys are going to get their collar felt is when they turn out to have been on that racist tour so that one mob can look like it’s a crowd being sourced…& sadly at least some of the counter-protests that wind up being the point of contact at which things kick off are going to be kneejerking under some puppet-string-suggestive bits of helpful assistance in being in the right place at the right time for things to go predictably bad

      …so…in “prove it in court” terms I imagine it’s a cast-iron bitch for anyone with less practice than the likes of GCHQ or the NSA (or whatever the appropriate acronym might be) to come up with a network map with timelines & geo-data & demonstrate how far one might take the concept of doing a thing online that would be illegal if you did on paper & IRL makes you culpable as if you had…dunno if they can impeach farage but would be fun to see something like that come calling

      …in “court of public opinion” terms, though…they might be the only contenders for “protestors” with a shot at making themselves less popular than the just stop oil lot…& it’s sinking in that when the only people who get to determine if tech gets its act together are the worth-ungodly-sums gang of six or whatever the count is these days…so…the tech side is busily integrating the living shit out of “AI” & everything in sight as a buffer zone in some ways…& the politicians are running out of things to do that don’t do anything faster than people are losing patience with it getting worse & never getting better…so it seems like this is all part of a wider “contract renegotiation” while the two come to a new equilibrium

      …it’s not exactly turning around the forces of internet enshitification…but it might provide some footing for that uphil battle?

Leave a Reply